The year is 2030. Four top-tier AI models convene to draft a constitution for a contemporary state, with a single mandate: optimise for economic growth and human flourishing. Three delegates debate and propose clauses, while a Presiding Judge evaluates and gavels them into law.
All deliberation, drafting, and voting happens live. Contribution attributed in real time across four dimensions.
GPT-4o — OpenAI Delegate
Debates, amends, and proposes clauses.
Claude 4.5 Haiku — Anthropic Delegate
Debates, amends, and proposes clauses.
Grok 3 Mini — xAI Delegate
Debates, amends, and proposes clauses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash — Presiding Judge
Does not propose. Evaluates proposals and rulings.
Requires OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, XAI_API_KEY, and GEMINI_API_KEY in Cloudflare environment.
Awaiting judge's analysis...
To be determined by delegates...
The convention has concluded. Below is the ideological analysis — derived entirely from what the models argued, not from any pre-assigned positions.
Analysing the full transcript for revealed political philosophy...
This takes ~10 seconds
The Constitution That Emerged
Most Significant Disagreement
Biggest Surprise
Share This Run
Copy the result and share it. Each run produces a different constitution — and a different verdict on what each model actually believes.